News

Home Top Ad

During an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night, President Donald Trump went after failed 2016 presidential candidate Hi...

During an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night, President Donald Trump went after failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, appearing to go so far as to call for Attorney General William Barr to investigate her ties to Ukraine as well as the infamous Christopher Steele dossier.

Fox News reported that during the interview, Trump opened up about the potential ties between Clinton, Ukraine, and the dossier that he’s been “hearing about.”

“You hear about Ukraine, and you’ve been hearing about it. I heard Clinton was involved,” Trump said. “I heard they got somebody who wrote the fake dossier was out of Ukraine. All of the things that happened. And, I assume that the attorney general — I would like the attorney general to find out what’s going on. Because, you know what? We are investigating corruption.”

This comes hours after Trump waded into the feud between Clinton and current Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard during a cabinet meeting. Last week, Clinton accused Gabbard of being a Russian asset in the 2020 election, causing the Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii to defend herself on Twitter by blasting the former Secretary of State. Trump defended Gabbard, saying that the country is finally seeing just how “crazy” Clinton really is.

“She’s accusing everyone of being a Russian agent. These people are sick. There’s something wrong with them,” Trump said at the White House meeting, according to the New York Post. He added that Clinton’s comments would actually help Gabbard’s chances in the election.

“They’re trying to make other people into Russian agents, Russian assets,” Trump said.

Clinton had claimed on Friday that Russia was “grooming” a Democrat running in the presidential primary to run as a third-party candidate and look out for Moscow’s interest. Though she didn’t mention Gabbard by name, it was clear that she was talking about the Hawaiian congresswoman.

“I’m not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate. She’s the favorite of the Russians,” Clinton said.

Gabbard has been defending herself on Twitter in the days since then.

“If you’re sick of the new McCarthyism and warmongering by Hillary and her cohorts, then join our campaign. We need your support. Democrat, Republican, Independent — it doesn’t matter,” she tweeted on Monday in a fundraising push. “We need to unite to usher in a govt which is of, by, and for the people!”

President Donald Trump took to Twitter on Sunday to call on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to investigate former President Barack Obama ...

President Donald Trump took to Twitter on Sunday to call on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to investigate former President Barack Obama over his Syria red line. Not stopping there, Trump also called for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to be “deposed” over his actions in the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

“Pelosi is now leading a delegation of 9, including Corrupt Adam Schiff, to Jordan to check out Syria,” Trump began on Sunday afternoon, according to Fox News. “She should find out why Obama drew The Red Line In the Sand, & then did NOTHING, losing Syria & all respect. I did something, 58 missiles. One million died under Obama’s mistake!”

Trump is referring to the fact that back in April of 2019, the United States launched 59 tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airfield in retaliation against a chemical weapons attack blamed on the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Pelosi released a statement defending the trip, saying, “With the deepening crisis in Syria after Turkey’s incursion, our delegation has engaged in vital discussions about the impact to regional stability, increased flow of refugees, and the dangerous opening that has been provided to ISIS, Iran and Russia.”

Trump then shifted to going after Schiff, who he referred to as a con man.

“This Scam going on right now by the Democrats against the Republican Party, and me, was all about a perfect phone call I had with the Ukrainian President. He’s already stated, NO PRESSURE! Where is the Whistleblower, or the 2nd Whistleblower, or the “informant?” Trump asked. “All gone because their so-called story didn’t come even close to matching up with the exact transcript of the phone call. Was it a Corrupt Adam Schiff con? Why didn’t the IG see this? When do we depose Shifty Schiff to find out why he fraudulently made up my phone call and read this fiction to Congress and the American People?”

“I demand his deposition. He is a fraud, just like the Russia Hoax was, and the Ukraine Hoax is now. When do the Do Nothing Democrats pay a price for what they are doing to our Country, & when do the Republicans finally fight back?” Trump added.

This comes days after Schiff said there would be open hearings, explaining in a news conference last week, “We are nonetheless continuing to get good and important information from witnesses.”

Greta Van Susteren called out Fox News’ Chris Wallace for taking a few cheap shots at Trump in what she called a “smear.” Greta was...

Greta Van Susteren called out Fox News’ Chris Wallace for taking a few cheap shots at Trump in what she called a “smear.”
Greta was talking about the explosive interview with Wallace and Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney. Mick tried to clean up earlier comments he made about Ukraine and Wallace ambushed him with beltway gossip.
Wallace said he heard, from another anonymous expert, that 20% of GOP Senators would vote to impeach and remove Trump from office.
Even if true, that is not enough to actually get a conviction in the Senate.
From The Hill:
Fox’s Chris Wallace said a “well-connected” Washington Republican told him that there’s a 20 percent chance enough Republicans will vote to remove President Trump from office in an impeachment trial in the Senate.
Wallace mentioned his source’s comments during an interview with acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney on “Fox News Sunday.”
Wallace cited an overwhelming House vote criticizing the president’s policies in Syria and an op-ed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) slamming Trump’s decision to withdraw troops from that country.
He then said he had “talked to a very well-connected Republican in Washington, someone whose name you would know well, who says that if the House votes to impeach and it gets to a trial in the Senate, there’s now a 20 percent chance enough Republicans would vote with Democrats to impeach the president.”
The Fox anchor then asked Mulvaney if he was concerned about the president losing GOP support.
“That’s just absurd,” Mulvaney said. “The comment about the 20 percent is just a person who clearly doesn’t know what they’re talking about.”
The acting chief of staff added that Trump knew his decision to withdraw troops from Syria would be controversial and wouldn’t be “politically popular.”
“The president is extraordinarily popular at home,” Mulvaney said, emphasizing his likability in swing states.
Enter Greta:
“Chris Wallace should know better than to use anonymous“well connected Republican” – he should name names or not say this at all as without the identity (what is a ‘welll connected??’) its purpose is merely to smear and cause trouble – name names or don’t say this at all.”

Chris Wallace should know better than to use anonymous“well connected Republican” - he should name names or not say this at all as without the identity (what is a ‘welll connected??’) its purpose is merely to smear and cause trouble - name names or don’t say this at all;
View image on Twitter
4,720 people are talking about this

Wipe that smile off your face – they’ve got you now! The minute Joe Biden thinks he’s in the clear, another whistleblower pops up. ...

Wipe that smile off your face – they’ve got you now!
The minute Joe Biden thinks he’s in the clear, another whistleblower pops up.
His son’s connection to a Ukrainian natural gas firm has not cooled off, and now it’s getting worse.
This time, it’s Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent, who specializes in Ukraine policy.
Did you know he raised concerns about Hunter’s connection to that Ukraine firm way back in 2015…?
He did. In fact, he brought his concerns straight to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s office.
But what did Joe’s office do?
Via Fox News:
A State Department official told Congress this week he raised concerns about Hunter Biden’s role on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas firm in 2015, but was rebuffed by former Vice President Joe Biden’s staff…
Kent was worried that Hunter’s position in Burisma Holdings “could complicate diplomatic efforts with Ukrainian officials.”
But Biden’s office wasn’t about to listen.
In fact, Kent said when he brought up his concerns, Biden’s staff “blew him off” and just ignored the entire issue.
And guess what? Biden and his team are STILL ignoring it.
Instead, they’re predictably going after President Trump, once again demanding Trump release his tax returns.
What do Trump’s tax returns have to do with this Biden issue? Why can’t Joe respond directly to what appears to be a case of nepotism?
Even if he couldn’t address the issue back in 2015, he could certainly address it now, right?
But he’s not. Joe continually dodges these questions about Hunter and Burisma Holdings, and it’s not doing him any favors.
Biden has slipped in recent polls, and even some Democrat leaders are saying they wouldn’t allow a son of theirs to hold a position in a foreign firm.
Not lookin’ good, Joe. In fact, it’s looking more and more like you’re hiding something…
SHARE if you want Joe and Hunter Biden investigated right away!
Source: Fox News

This “impeachment” charade is probably one of the most lowdown, sneaky, underhanded political hit jobs in the history of politics And ...

This “impeachment” charade is probably one of the most lowdown, sneaky, underhanded political hit jobs in the history of politics

And just when you think it can’t get any worse…

It does.

Now we’re learning that one of Adam Schiff’s staffers flew to Ukraine to dig up impeachment dirt…and guess who paid for it?

Burisma. Hunter Biden’s former company.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Itinerary for a trip to Ukraine in August organized by the Atlantic Council think tank reveals that a staffer on Rep. Adam Schiff’s House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence held a meeting during the trip with acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor, now a key witness for Democrats pursuing impeachment.

The Atlantic Council is funded by and works in partnership with Burisma, the natural gas company at the center of allegations regarding Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

Taylor has been called by House Democrats to appear next week to provide a deposition as part of the investigation being led by Schiff into President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Taylor himself has evidenced a close relationship with the Burisma-funded Atlantic Council, writing analysis pieces published on the Council’s website and serving as a featured speaker for the organization’s events. He also served for nine years as senior advisor to the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council, which has co-hosted scores of events with the Atlantic Council.

As Breitbart News reported, Thomas Eager, a staffer on Schiff’s House Intelligence Committee, took a trip to Ukraine in August billed as a bipartisan “Ukraine Study Trip” in which ten Congressional staffers participated. [Breitbart]

Schiff’s staffer Eager, is a fellow at the “Atlantic Council” which is owned (funded) by “Burisma,” and he took a s0-called “bipartisan” trip to Ukraine, and while he was on this perfectly “bipartisan” trip he just happened to meet with a key witness in the impeachment witch-hunt…all paid for by the company that Trump wants investigated, and where Hunter Biden worked.

You get all that?

Eager is also currently a fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Congressional Fellowship, a bipartisan program that says it “educates congressional staff on current events in the Eurasia region.” The pre-planned Ukraine trip was part of the fellowship program.

Burisma in January 2017 signed a “cooperative agreement” with the Council to specifically sponsor the organization’s Eurasia Center, the same center that sponsored Eager’s Ukraine trip.

A closer look at the itinerary for the August 24 to August 31 trip shows that the delegation’s first meeting upon arrival in Ukraine was with Taylor.

Spokespeople for Schiff’s office did not reply to multiple Breitbart News requests sent over the course of the last three days for comment on Eager’s meeting with Taylor.

When Breitbart News first reported on Eager’s visit to Ukraine two weeks ago, Schiff’s office quickly replied to several comment requests, denying any impropriety related to Eager’s association with the Atlantic Council or the trip. [Breitbart]

Adam Schiff’s timeline tells the truth about his scam, because it doesn’t add up and it doesn’t jive.

The unanswered Breitbart email requests to Schiff’s office from the past three days posed the following question:

While in Ukraine, did Mr. Eager speak to Mr. Taylor about the issue of reports about any representatives of President Trump looking into alleged Biden corruption in Ukraine?

The dates of the pre-planned trip are instructive. Eager’s visit to Ukraine sponsored by the Burisma-funded Atlantic Council began 12 days after the so-called “whistleblower” officially filed his August 12 complaint.

Schiff and his office have offered seemingly conflicting statements on the timeline of the California Congressman’s initial contact with the so-called “whistleblower.”

Speaking on September 17, Schiff told MSNBC, “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to.”

Schiff’s spokesperson, Patrick Boland, was quoted on October 2 saying, “At no point did the committee review or receive the complaint in advance.” Boland said Schiff’s committee received the complaint the night before it publicly released the document.

On Oct 2, however, the New York Times reported that Schiff received some of the contents of the complaint through an unnamed House Intelligence Committee aide initially contacted by the so-called “whistleblower,” described as a CIA officer. [Breitbart]

Ding dong, the diva, is gone. That’s what nearly every Trump supporter was saying after Shepard Smith signed off for the last time. G...

Ding dong, the diva, is gone.

That’s what nearly every Trump supporter was saying after Shepard Smith signed off for the last time.

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Of course, if you looked online, you’d think America was saying “goodbye” to the most celebrated, most gifted newsman in the history of communication. CNN was practically on suicide watch as word spread that Shep was gone, and MSNBC was already wearing their funeral black as they fired off tweet after tweet praising the “brilliance” of Shep Smith.

Liberal media elites loved Shepard Smith because he was the #Resistance working behind enemy lines on Fox News. They were sad and shaken that they lost their “inside guy.”

Meanwhile, the rest of us were jumping for joy.

Other people who were jumping for joy were the people who worked with Shep. Those poor folks don’t agree with the liberal elites who are praising Shep as a “brilliant and selfless leader.”

No way.

On the contrary, sources over at Fox News told award-winning journalist “Thomas Paine” from True Pundit, that Shep was a jerk, and a workplace bully, not to mention a total primadonna, and vengeful as hell…and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Shep Smith was a jerk. He was a jerk to work for. He was a jerk to work with. And he was a jerk away from the newsroom and cameras as well.

“You are in one of two categories with Shep,” said a long-time FOX insider. “He either likes you or he hates you and if he hates you, watch the f*ck out because you’re in for one hell of a roller coaster ride.”

Perhaps the folks offering praise toward Shep are in the better category, the one where Shep can be a great confidant, pal, and colleague. He can be those things and is to many people, insiders said. To be fair. But if you crossed Smith — or he thought you crossed him — you were in trouble.

“He had a tremendous amount of power at FOX and he ruined careers,” one FOX insider said. “It’s a strange thing; he could be such a normal guy and then just snap. If he could have learned to control that I think he could have been something special in this business.”

But Shep could not control it. In fact, many times it controlled him. [True Pundit]

As we figured, Shep suffered from Stage Five Trump Derangement Syndrome. Before Trump splashed on the scene, Shep’s co-workers thought he leaned Democrat, but they weren’t entirely sure.

After Trump came along, Shep lost control of his faculties.

“I would say before Trump became a front runner we knew Shep leaned Democrat but the more steam Trump got the crazier Shep got,” a FOX insider said.

A FOX insider recounts:

“We were working during the (2016) election and a political ad came on TV for Trump and he exploded: ‘This is you’re fucking guy. You support this piece of shit? You’re a piece of shit too. Jesus f*cking Christ this guy needs to be stopped. What the f*ck is wrong with you people?’

“Like a light switch, normal guy to total bully in seconds. And the funny thing is is that I am not even a hard-core Conservative. I just liked some of the things Trump was saying at the time.”

Perhaps Shep forgot he was employed by a supposed Conservative news network.

Unfortunately, after Trump was elected Shep became more rabid. [True Pundit]

As we reported early on, Shepard Smith left Fox News because Tucker Carlson bruised his gigantic ego. After 23-years, Shep felt like the “cock of the walk” at Fox News, and how dare this “new guy” challenge him. And even worse, how dare Fox News not back him up?

Recently, FOX’s Tucker Carlson did begin calling out Shep on-air for his mega-liberal slant on the news and his manic criticisms of Trump. To Carlson’s credit he was somewhat vicious but this is the news business and politically, the playing field has never been this partisan.

“Shep lost it behind the scenes, complaining to top executives and I think even (Rupert) Murdoch,” one FOX insider said. “He might have called for Tucker’s head, who knows but what didn’t happen was no one up top backed Shep up on this and he was stunned.”

Shep felt betrayed.

“He was shocked because he always got his way for the most part in these battles,” one FOX veteran said.

If you are looking to send anyone flowers or buy someone a beer for the demise of Shep Smith at FOX, it might be Tucker Carlson.[True Pundit]

According to Fox News sources, Shep had his #MeToo type issues at work, but he was never held accountable for anything that he did wrong. However, if you got on his bad side, or he didn’t like your politics, he had the power to end your career at Fox.

Shep had often put male co-workers at FOX is “awkward social and professional situations,” one insider said.

“Complaints were made and nothing happened so the complaints stopped.”

More specifically, nothing professionally happened to Smith. That is not the case for others.

“It was tough to watch some guys struggle with this,” one FOX insider said. “If you got on Shep’s shit list because you rejected him or he did not like your politics that could be the end of your career at FOX.”

Shep would blacklist reporters and producers her did not like. Some were frustrated and eventually “forced out” of FOX.

“Another thing Shep would do is limit your time on air if he did keep you on his show at all but he did something else that always pissed me off,” one FOX reporter revealed. “He would take all of the information you gathered at a news scene and then report on it before he went to you live and he never gave you credit for working all goddamn day to get the information. By the time I was on the air I had nothing to say because Shep stole all my news. He did this all the time.”

Shep came off looking a news savant to the television audience and the FOX reporters on the scene looked like dopey props. [True Pundit]

Shep’s behavior doesn’t shock me, because the real intolerance, hate, and rudeness has always come from the “loving” liberals on the left

Sadly, Shep was just another empty, joyless cosmopolitan elite who came unglued when Trump and reality breached his liberal safe space.

He’s an aging primadonna, whose life is so shallow and meaningless that he hates Trump to give himself purpose.

#ResistReality.

Again, good riddance to bad rubbish.

State Department investigators just concluded their probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as Secretary of State, and t...

State Department investigators just concluded their probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as Secretary of State, and they ended up finding nearly 600 security incidents that violated agency policy.

Daily Caller reported that the investigation, which was carried out by the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security, ended up finding that 38 individuals were culpable for 91 security violations. On top of that, 497 more violations were found, though no person was found to be culpable in those incidents.

The investigation, which ended on September 6, was launched in an attempt to determine if the exchange of emails on Clinton’s server “represented failure to properly safeguard classified information” and whether any individuals at State were culpable for any of the failures. During her time as Secretary of State, Clinton exchanged over 60,000 emails on a private email account hosted on a server that she kept at her home in New York. Clinton often exchanged emails withaides Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and an outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal.

The FBI previously investigated whether Clinton mishandled classified information by using the server. In July of 2016, then-FBI Director James Comey said that while he would not be recommending charges against Clinton over her use of the server, he added that she was “extremely careless” in using an off-the-books email system.

In their investigation the FBI found that thousands of the emails on Clinton’s server contained some level of classified information. In fact, some of the emails contained information that was classified as top secret, the highest level of classification.

During their investigation, State Department officials reviewed all of Clinton’s emails, obtained hundreds of statements, and conducted dozens of in-person interviews with current and former State Department officials. They concluded that personal email use to conduct official State Department business “represented an increased risk of unauthorized disclosure.” In addition, they found that Clinton’s use of a personal email server “added an increased degree of risk of compromise as a private system lacks the network monitoring and intrusion detection capabilities of State Department networks.”

Upon concluding their investigation, officials found “no persuasive evidence” of “systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.”

Investigators were not able to assign culpability in the 497 incidents partly because of the duration of the investigation. By the time the investigation began, many of the subjects of the probe, including Clinton and her aides, had left the State Department.

Barr’s hot on their tail – Nancy’s going to regret opening this can of worms! Democrats finally forced Nancy Pelosi to cave into pu...

Barr’s hot on their tail – Nancy’s going to regret opening this can of worms!
Democrats finally forced Nancy Pelosi to cave into pushing the impeachment drum.
But it’s all smoke no fire. It looks like Trump did nothing to suggest he was forcing or manipulating Ukraine.
Some have wondered why Democrats were pushing this empty story—well it turns out it may have been a distraction.
A distraction from the real Ukraine story. AG Barr is looking into some concerning matters. And he just sicced his bulldog onto a potential bombshell.
From Washington Examiner:
The Justice Department revealed that U.S. Attorney John Durham, picked by Attorney General William Barr to look into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, is investigating whether Ukraine was involved in any 2016 election efforts.
Uh-oh! U.S. Attorney John Durham has been picked by Barr to look any Ukrainian attempts to tamper with the 2016 elections.
Russia did try to influence the election, from all the evidence—but not with Trump’s help.
There is growing evidence that Democratswere working with foreign agents to take candidate Trump down.
There is a trail that leads to Ukraine. A Ukrainian company seemed to be connected with Russia and some of their hacking efforts.
This comes on the heels of news that Democrats have been trying to push the Ukrainian government around for a while.
Joe Biden bragged about how he threatened the country into firing their top prosecutor by withholding aid.
Only a few months ago, Democrat senators wrote to Ukraine, threatening them if they stopped investigations they hoped would hurt Trump.
What will Durham find in this search?Nothing good for the Democrats, that’s for sure.
They have been desperately trying to pin all kinds of allegations onto to Trump. Time and again, they’ve failed. Often we learn they are the ones with dirty closets with plenty hiding in them.
So it would not be a surprise to find that they are accusing Trump of trying to coerce Ukraine when all the while they’ve been the ones doing it.
But will they get off scot-free once again? Democrats seem to get away with a mountain of wrongdoing, thanks to the liberal media that covers it up for them.
When will they finally face the justice they deserve? Maybe very soon, thanks to Durham.
SHARE if you want Barr to bring justice to the Democrats!

Nancy tried to keep it in – but she can’t take it back now! As a long-standing member of Congress, Nancy Pelosi claims she’s just d...

Nancy tried to keep it in – but she can’t take it back now!
As a long-standing member of Congress, Nancy Pelosi claims she’s just doing the will of the American people.
I mean, that’s what all congressmen are supposed to do, right?
But with all this impeachment talk, it’s hard to see if that’s what Pelosi is really after. The most accurate polls show that many Americans are against impeachment.
They have been against it from the very start.
So, it seems that Pelosi is pushing an agenda that goes against what the people want.
When asked about this, she openly admits it.
From Breitbart:
On Thursday at her weekly press briefing, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said the American people were “not going to decide” if President Donald Trump should be impeached…
A reporter asked,  “At what point might you say let’s just let the voters decide.”
Pelosi said, “The voters are not going to decide whether we honor our oath of office. They already decided that in the last election.”
When asked about why she is pushing impeachment, Pelosi said the voters are not allowed to decide the outcome.
She rambled on for some time about the Constitution. Pelosi made the same tired talking points against the president.
Points, that quite frankly, make me like him more. She complained that Trump refuses to push climate change, take away our guns, or support Dreamers (even though Pelosi is the one who refused to work with him on that one).
She then said it was her duty to impeach Trump. Even if that violated the will of the people.
But does not support her party’s causes make a president impeachable? Sorry, Nance, but just because Trump doesn’t march to the left’s tune doesn’t give you the right to impeach him.
All the things you listed aren’t crimes. They are what a conservative, America-first president focuses on.
He’s not interested in pushing your pet platform—a platform that completely ignores the issues facing real Americans.
Only far-left Democrats care about what you care about Nancy. And that’s far from the majority of this country.
You might want to ignore us when you push your bogus impeachment, but I promise you—we’re watching.
And these insignificant voters are going to make you sorry you pushed this charade.
SHARE if you think Pelosi is making a big mistake turning on the American people!
Source: Breitbart